![]() ![]() These shared elements range from the mundane, as in the new search toolbar and overhauled print interface, to the exotic, such as the added locale options and developer features that include new grid-control types and the ability to extend database drivers. It should be no surprise - given the relatively recent forking of the code base - that most, if not all, of the improvements in 3.3 are also available in the LibreOffice package. It’s polished and rather user-friendly, runs on a wide range of platforms and is well-suited for any organisation that doesn’t want to commit itself to Microsoft’s ecosystem of Exchange, SharePoint and their related tools. ![]() A polished productĪside from the debates over community control and the right of ownership, it’s hard for me to come up with significant faults in the suite. Instead, three of the leading Linux distributions (Canonical, Novell and Red Hat) have rallied behind LibreOffice, leaving Oracle as the only significant supporter of the project.įor further details of the schism between the two open source office suites, see eWEEK’s review of LibreOffice 3.3. It didn’t have to be this way: Had Oracle chosen an uncharacteristically conciliatory path, the LibreOffice and projects would not have forked in the first place. No, if 3.3 fails to gain traction, it will be because its potential users decline to be dependent on the whims of Oracle, which assumed the leadership of the project with the acquisition last year of Sun Microsystems. The 3.3 release of the suite debuted at the end of January, shortly after the release of its fraternal twin, LibreOffice 3.3, and is as polished as one might expect in a set of applications that have been under development in one form or another for roughly 20 years. The suite may be in danger of becoming an also-ran among office-productivity suites, but not for any lack of capabilities or features. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |